“Living” takes you back to a time of bottled-up emotions and societal constraints, where one man’s realization of a wasted existence becomes the focal point. offers an authentic glimpse into the post-war era of Britain, delving deep into the psyche of middle management and one man’s gradual awakening to the true essence of life.
Bill Nighy delivers an impeccable performance as Mr. Williams, a sad-sack office drone suffocating in bureaucracy. With his signature reserved charm, Nighy perfectly embodies a man detached from the vibrant essence of living.
Set in the 1950s, the film captures the stifled atmosphere of the era, where people concealed their true feelings and thoughts behind polite smiles. When Mr. Williams receives a terminal cancer diagnosis, he decides it’s high time to leave a mark before kicking the bucket.
“Living” falls short of it’s potential
While the film’s concept holds promise, it isn’t able to produce the desired output. The deliberate pacing, aiming to recreate the spirit of the time, often feels like a snail’s race, testing the your patience. And those scenes where Mr. Williams briefly embraces a night of debauchery- uninspiring and far from the excitement of the original movie. It’s like they drained the life out of it.
Director Hermanus‘ interpretation fails to capture the desperation, sadness and emotional intensity of the original 1952 classic, “Ikiru,” which inspired this lackluster remake. The relentless piano score, coupled with repetitive shots of Mr. Williams’ sorrowful face, becomes grating making you wish they’d just get over with it.
Bill Nighy shines as Mr. Williams
But, let’s give credit where it’s due. Bill Nighy, injects a glimmer of life into an otherwise dull affair. He flawlessly portrays the character’s transformation from a mindless cog to a man on a mission. The supporting cast, including the spirited Miss Harris, played by a talented actress, adds a touch of competence to an otherwise lackluster production.
It won’t please everyone, especially those seeking excitement or gripping narratives. It’s a slow burn that aims to capture the era’s muted essence but it ends up being a snooze fest. While it may not hit the heights of greatness, it does force you to reflect on wasted time and missed opportunities, urging you to seize the present moment.
In short, “Living” is an film that leaves an impression, not always a positive one. It boasts a solid story and commendable performances, but it falls short of captivating or fulfilling its lofty ambitions. If you’re up for a dose of unfiltered realism and don’t mind enduring a sluggish pace, there are elements to appreciate.
